User talk:Vycl1994

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vycl1994!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neyko Nenov.png

File:Neyko Nenov.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hrithik Roshan's signature.jpg

File:Hrithik Roshan's signature.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

dk.logo.png

Good day Vycl1994

I have taken the picture of the logo myself. However if it is a violation of copyrights, then I'm happy to remove it. I belief in ethical and legal behavior. If it transgress copyright you may delete the file, as I can take it off the page, but do not know how to delete it.

User:Barry Ne

The image has been deleted, but not by me, as I am not an administrator. See Commons:Licensing for details on copyright. To put it simply, the copyright does not always belong to the file's uploader. In this case, File:Dk logo.png was designed on behalf of the education institution using it to identify themselves, and so the rights belong to Durbanville College, as stated on their website. Vycl1994 (talk) 17:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:Payne Midyette outside greenhouse.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:42, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Peterson Book Photo

Good morning. The photo of the front of a book used was taken by myself. Is it a copyright violation to take and use such a picture? Please advise. Thanks.

File:Naked - The Architecture Of Guy Peterson.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: book cover (https://www.amazon.com/Naked-Architecture-Guy-Peterson/dp/1941806554)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vycl1994 (talk) 02:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Architecttype (talk • contribs) 12:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The person who takes a photograph, scans it and uploads it to Commons is not always the copyright holder. For instance, if someone scanned the seven-book Harry Potter series cover to cover and uploaded it, the scan would be deleted. It is my understanding that book covers and books themselves are copyrighted by its creators, including the writer, and any illustrators and book cover artists. In the case of the above file, an administrator has judged it does not meet the threshold of originality, so it is therefore ineligible for copyright. As such it remains hosted on Commons.

I have also gone through the files you uploaded via Florida Memory and properly tagged them with {{PD-FLGov}} as {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} is the incorrect tag. Vycl1994 (talk) 00:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. Not sure whether usable of not? Certainly could be removed if an issue. As far as Florida Memory photos, I followed the process as prescribed in the upload instructions (entering the url for the photo). That was all that was required. Not sure what else I was supposed to do.Architecttype (talk) 17:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any properly licensed file hosted on Wikimedia Commons can be used freely used on any language Wikipedia. Vycl1994 (talk) 02:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Architecttype: You might like to known that works created by Paul Rudolph can be placed in Category:Paul Rudolph. Additionally please use the {{PD-FLGov}} template for files uploaded from Florida Memory, and the template {{PD-Rudolph}} for files from the Library of Congress originally produced by Paul Rudolph. Continue to tag pictures taken by yourself as {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Vycl1994 (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation - two files

Sir/Madam I own the filter bunker referenced in the wiki "raigmore filter bunker"

You are telling me the following two jpegs are copyright The lower floor of the bunker: lower floor of bunker 1989-2019

The upper floor of the bunker: upper floor of bunker 1989-2019

I measured the building myself, I drew the plans myself. So the copyright is mine to give away.

I have no idea how or why the subbrit page you reference gets the same plans - they must have visited the building before I bought it?

Anyway I have to dispute your copyright violation please.

How I prove I own the bunker? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iainmaoileoin (talk • contribs) 20:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not getting to this sooner, Iainmaoileoin. I'm more active on English Wikipedia and Wikidata.

To offer copyrighted material for use on Commons, please read Commons:OTRS. I'm no legal expert, but mere ownership of a building does not seem to give an owner the rights to architectural plans. It could be that the other webpages I've found are also hosting copyright violations. Wikimedia Commons can only include freely-licensed material, and must be careful with the potential for copyright infringement. Vycl1994 (talk) 18:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have read that link. I think you are confusing architectural plans (how to build the building) with a floor-plan (how to escape the building when there is a fire!) The issue is that there are only a few remaining bunkers of this sort - perhaps 4. People who have seen one may want to look at the floor-plan of another to compare the set-up. I think the fact there is a copyright infringement since there is also a floor-plan on subbrit is a red-herring. (1) there is no floor plan of my bunker (2) they could be - but are not - in copyright enfringement.

Can you please reinstate the files - they took some time to produce. Dr Maoileoin Iainmaoileoin (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Iainmaoileoin: I am not a Commons administrator and cannot reinstate the deleted files alone. As I stated, you are welcome to donate copyrighted materials through the Commons:OTRS process. If you provide evidence of permission through that process, the files will be undeleted. Vycl1994 (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

images and copyright

Hi, thank you for leaving a text message. I am trying to understand what do i need to do. Also a lots of issues are due to me finding it quite difficult to use the platform. Thank you for explanation and links. User:mbboston

File:Hannigan-Robyn-E-2019-Clarkson-University.jpg

Hello, Vycl1994. Steve Jacobs does not hold a copyright to this photo. He is a photographer employed by Clarkson University. Clarkson University has offered this photo as free content on Wikimedia Commons. Could you please let me know if further clarification in the Information tag is needed or if I should be filling it out differently? Thank you. Mpgriffin (talk) 02:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mpgriffin, with regards to File:Hannigan-Robyn-E-2019-Clarkson-University.jpg, please follow the steps outlined at COM:OTRS. Thanks! Vycl1994 (talk) 03:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use

I received permission from a photographer of this image 'File:Pearl Prescod as Tituba in The Crucible in 1965.jpg' to use their image on the page. How can I provide evidence of this permission which has been provided in an email.

EDIT: I have seen info on this topic above. Please delete

File:Samuel Boateng The Apprentice.jpg

Hello, This image has been marked for deletion as you have deemed that this image is screenshot. However, this image was taken in the live studio by a family member and does not breach copyright. Could your request for deletion please be removed. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justtheeditor1 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justtheeditor1 Please contact the family member, and ask them to corroborate your statement above via COM:OTRS. Thanks. Vycl1994 (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How would you like them to contact you to corroborate my statement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justtheeditor1 (talk • contribs) 12:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Brooksworth Pictures

You have marked these pictures for deletion however these are not screenshots and pictures taken by myself. What further evidence do you require? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justtheeditor1 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justtheeditor1 The metadata for your recent uploads disagrees with your above statement. As such please read, review, and follow the process outlined at COM:OTRS. Vycl1994 (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sen. Pittman / Rep. Stuzzi Pictures

Thank you for informing me of the accidental copyright-violation, I should've double-checked the copyright status of works by state-governments, over just the federal government.AnonContributorPA (talk) 22:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mate Turić deletions FYI

Hi, when you submitted Commons:Deletion requests/Art by Mate Turić, you included three files in the comments but they were not included in the deletion decision. Just letting you know that I've resubmitted them and two others in Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Mate Turić. Best, -M.nelson (talk) 19:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

請問

對不起，我不清楚這問題應該找誰問，所以請恕我用亂槍打鳥方式隨機找人問。如果你知道誰可以回答，請勇於推薦。我會非常感謝。

我要問的是法律問題，詳細如下：

版權相關：我常看到有人將照片是從新聞網站上傳，先不說對方是不是該網站的工作人員，光是版權就夠可疑了，因為網站上並沒有說照片可允許被上傳到維基百科。問題是誰能協助判斷？如果真的是侵犯版權，又該如何處理？
拍照行為：我是從某幾家公司知道，但我不便說是哪裡發生。他們說拍攝公司建築物的外觀，包含大門口，只要沒獲得允許，就是有觸犯商業祕密罪的嫌疑，因此他們認為有權阻止其攝影，並且有權對此提出法律行動。請問有誰對這方面的法律有了解，以協助判斷他們所說是否屬實？如果真的是屬實，為何維基百科沒有提醒大家注意要避免這種攝影行為？

125.230.87.170 01:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

很抱歉，我不認為自己是版權專家，但我覺得這些維基共享資源網頁是個很好的起點 (這些網頁都有中文版): COM:L, COM:FOP, Commons:Copyright rules, COM:DP. 如果您還有版權相關的任何問題，我建議您到COM:VP/C發文。 Vycl1994 (talk) 02:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

看起來好像只回答一個問題，那麼對於拍照行為，請問你有何指教？--125.230.87.170 05:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

關於拍照行為的建議，可能基於照片的主題或拍攝照片的地方，等等。更具體的建議可以在網頁連結中找到，從 Commons:Copyright rules, 到 Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter, Commons:Copyright rules by territory. 您之前提到的具體主題: "他們說拍攝公司建築物的外觀，包含大門口 ... " 我猜可能有關的就是 COM:FOP. Vycl1994 (talk) 05:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

但我也沒打算透過COM:L、COM:FOP、Commons:Copyright rules、COM:DP這些來使自己成為版權專家，我沒有那麼偉大，只不過太常看見別人的照片是從網站取來，感到不知如何是好。如果有專家可以協助，我就可以直接將我看到的照片拿給他看。最後，你說FOP是什麼？這與商業秘密有何關係？--125.230.87.170 06:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

如果您發現先前發佈的受版權保護的頁面已上傳至維基共享資源，您可以使用共享資源:刪除方針所述的步驟開始討論可能需要刪除的檔案。

據我了解，FOP 權利在許多地方都有所不同。例如，在台灣，可以上傳建築物的簡單圖片，但如果建築物或附近有公共藝術品，FOP 可能會受到限制。公共建築的樸素外觀應該可以被拍攝，因為簡單的建築不應包含商業機密。請記得我也不是專家。我所說的只是我個人對主題的理解。

對版權懂更多的人都在COM:VP/C。他們能協助比我多。 Vycl1994 (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Vycl1994

Contents

File:Neyko Nenov.png

File:Hrithik Roshan's signature.jpg

dk.logo.png

Image without license

File:Payne Midyette outside greenhouse.jpg

Guy Peterson Book Photo

copyright violation - two files

images and copyright

File:Hannigan-Robyn-E-2019-Clarkson-University.jpg

Permission to use

File:Samuel Boateng The Apprentice.jpg

Samuel Brooksworth Pictures

Sen. Pittman / Rep. Stuzzi Pictures

Mate Turić deletions FYI

請問

Navigation menu

User talk:Vycl1994

File:Neyko Nenov.png

File:Hrithik Roshan's signature.jpg

dk.logo.png

Image without license

File:Payne Midyette outside greenhouse.jpg

Guy Peterson Book Photo

copyright violation - two files

images and copyright

File:Hannigan-Robyn-E-2019-Clarkson-University.jpg

Permission to use

File:Samuel Boateng The Apprentice.jpg

Samuel Brooksworth Pictures

Sen. Pittman / Rep. Stuzzi Pictures

Mate Turić deletions FYI

請問

Navigation menu

Search